The “Power of We”

43911154-we

This post is here to celebrate “The power of we” as part of the blog Action Day 2012.

It is undeniable that there is an amazingly huge power in the “We”. Common wisdom affirms that two heads are better than one. But truth is, it takes more than just gathering two, three, hundreds of heads to render better results. The real power of we comes from an understanding of the underlying forces of the social ties that we weave among ourselves, a better grasp of our social networks. I find the bucket brigades example, from Nicholas Christakis’ book connected, a telling illustration of the difference: 

Imagine your house is on fire. Luckily, a cool river runs nearby. But you are all alone. You run back and forth to the river, bucket in hand, toting gallon after gallon of water to splash on your burning home. Unfortunately, your efforts are useless. Without some help, you will not be able to carry water fast enough to outpace the inferno.
Now suppose that you are not alone. You have one hundred neighbors, and, lucky for you, they all feel motivated to help. And each one just happens to have a bucket. If your neighbors are sufficiently strong, they can run back and forth to the river, haphazardly  dumping buckets of water on the fire. A hundred people tossing water on your burning house is clearly better than you doing it by yourself. The problem is that once they get started your neighbors waste a lot of time running back and forth. Some of them tire easily; others are uncoordinated and spill a lot of water; one guy gets lost on his way back to your house. If each person acts independently, then your house will surely be destroyed.
Fortunately, this does not happen because a peculiar form of social organization is deployed: the bucket brigade. Your hundred neighbors form a line from the river to your house, passing full buckets of water toward your house and empty buckets toward the river. Not only does the bucket brigade arrangement mean that people do not have to spend time and energy walking back and forth to the river; it also means that weaker people who might not be able to walk or carry a heavy bucket long distances now have something to offer. A hundred people taking part in a bucket brigade might do the work of two hundred people running haphazardly.
Source: 
Connected

So when the ties are purposely woven to accomplish a common goal, the group/network becomes more powerful than the nodes, and the power of We shines in all its brightness. Pretty simple, right? Then why are most of us still running into the second situation? Why are we incapable of effectively leveraging  the networks around us to achieve the change we’re hoping for?

Technology has made us more densely networked than ever. The six degrees of separation are shrinking to a mere four, proving that we are closer to each other than we ever were. It is a fact though that technology has gotten ahead of us, that we aren’t catching up fast enough and that our culture is not following. In today’s interconnected world, we are still operating with a traditional mindset when we should fully adopt a networked one. 
What does adopting a networked mindset entail?In a nutshell, wiring our brain for Openness, peering, sharing and acting globally.
In the words of Tapscott himself “It’s a question of stagnation versus renewal. Atrophy versus renaissance. Peril versus promise.” So, What are we waiting for?
Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s